OtakuTalk

Affiliates: Tablecats Lounge! Tinychan! /prog/ Ylilauta! Vectors! Your link here!

Boards: /d/

Topic: MANGA ARTISTS UNITE TO OPPOSE ANTI-LOLI BILL


Anonymous A started this discussion 7.6 years ago #70

MANGA ARTISTS UNITE TO OPPOSE ANTI-LOLI BILL
http://hangmen13.16ops.com/?p=3282#more-3282

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 41 minutes later[Top] #558

> Lol, brb goin to jail for thought crime.

I'm no pedo but this shits ridiculous. No no no, just fucking no.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[Top] #575

ALL OF MY HATE
I WISH THERE WAS A BIGGER FONT

Anonymous B replied with this 7.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[Top] #584

@previous

THERE IS A BIGGER FONT



lol

(Edited 50 seconds later by a moderator.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[Top] #626

wtf is this shit? Since when has Japan been opposed to offbeat sexual fetishes?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 1 week later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,081

Japan passing an anti-loli law???
<spoiler> oh noes where will i get mah imitation CP from?! </spoiler>
lol if this law goes thru expect a lulzy mass seppuku from teh pedos

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,086

@previous

It already failed.
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/03/19/tokyo-loli-ban-fails/

Also, pro-lolicon law!!!
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2008/10/21/pro-lolicon-law-demanded-by-politician/

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,087

@previous

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,088

Japanese has law against child porn or sexual moletering of underage already.
banning fictional lolicon drawing would be gone too far, I'd say.
-On

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,090

@1,086

Woo~!

Anonymous I double-posted this 7.6 years ago, 22 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,091

@1,087

Ugh...

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,107

BY YOUR POWERS COMBINED, I AM CAPTAIN PEDO!

Anonymous I replied with this 7.6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,108

@previous

asdf

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,116

@1,107

Somebody photoshop this.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 4 days later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,487

@previous
lulz my skillz have slipped

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous J replied with this 7.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,488

@previous

I am detecting large quantities of win in this sector.

You should carefully cut off the hair, make the hair it's own channel, then use blending options to turn it green, and do the same to his face to turn that blue. I would do it but I've been working constantly.

Anonymous L replied with this 7.6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,489

@previous
like this?
:3

(Edited 4 minutes later.)

Anonymous J replied with this 7.6 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #1,490

@previous

BRILLIANT

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7.6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,492

@1,489

OMFG LOL

Anonymous I replied with this 7.5 years ago, 11 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,508

@1,489

I love you so much Anon. So much.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,535

LOLICON is the most INSIDIOUS form of CHILD EXPLOITATION ever devised, degenerate PEDO-FILTH cunningly disguised as juvenile entertainment!!! DON'T let this kind of SICK FUCKERY traumatize our precious youth!!!

FOR CHRISSAKE, THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!1!!

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Anonymous I replied with this 7.5 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,542

@previous

Ew. This reminds me of Panda Go Panda...

Anonymous N replied with this 7.5 years ago, 12 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,574

@previous

How can anyone say 'ew' about Mimiko?

Anonymous I replied with this 7.5 years ago, 15 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,576

@previous

Shes 5 years old.

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,594

@1,574

gtfo

Anonymous N replied with this 7.5 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,623

@1,576

No. It's a picture. Nonexistent children have no age.

Anonymous I replied with this 7.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,624

@previous

Dude, stop posting that. Your going to get OT taken down again.

Anonymous F replied with this 7.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,625

@previous

For an image from an animation made for children? I think you got a sick mind!

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,627

@previous

> For an image from an animation made for children? I think you got a sick mind!

Now now, lets not fight.

Anonymous F replied with this 7.5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,638

@previous

Don't worry, I have a sick mind myself. But I also know that just because I see things with a dirty mind doesn't means that the things are dirty.

Anonymous I replied with this 7.5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,641

@previous

I see what your trying to say but...
> implying this stuff is not made to pander to 40 year old cp lovers.

No, its not cp, no they do not have age. But the userbase for these anime is made up entirely of cp lovers

(Edited 25 seconds later.)

Anonymous F replied with this 7.5 years ago, 37 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,645

@previous

Ghibli anime have many panty shots, even in movies made for small kids because kids really behave like that!

In child anime/cartoons panty shots used to be used to show childish innocence or for comical purposes (like whe kids say "I saw your panty" when they have no knowledge about anything sexual)
Older episodes of Doraemon feature these happening to Shizuka and sometimes other girls for various reasons. There was also an episode where Nobita uses the Moshimo Phonebox to become a girl named Nobiko where he/she falls down the stairs and gets one.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x508sh_shizuka-panchira_videogames

In my country they used to be common in some comics with 6 years old characters that I used to read when I was a kid but today they are being censored more and more.

Anonymous N replied with this 7.5 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,661

@1,641

> the userbase for these anime is made up entirely of cp lovers

No. The audience is made up almost entirely of children under the age of 10. Hardcore pedos would have no interest in something as tame as Doraemon or Panda go Panda.

Anonymous P replied with this 7.5 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,667

@previous

> >the userbase for these anime is made up entirely of cp lovers
>
> No. The audience is made up almost entirely of children under the age of 10. Hardcore pedos would have no interest in something as tame as Doraemon or Panda go Panda.

Maybe a few years ago yeah but not anymore. And the artists know this too because they themselves are CP lovers.

Anonymous F replied with this 7.5 years ago, 37 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,671

@previous

Troll confirmed!

Anonymous P replied with this 7.5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,677

@previous

No not really.

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,682

@1,671

someone disagrees with you so they must be a troll
< AnT is over that way faggot

Anonymous F replied with this 7.5 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,687

@previous

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,688

In cartoons from all the world there are pantyshots with very young characters because children do behave that way! You are projecting this on others because you are a CP lover yourself!

Anonymous R double-posted this 7.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,689

@previous

Anonymous R triple-posted this 7.5 years ago, 20 seconds later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,690

@previous

Anonymous R quadruple-posted this 7.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,691

@previous

Anonymous R quintuple-posted this 7.5 years ago, 27 seconds later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,692

@previous

Anonymous R just kept on posting this 7.5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,693

@1,667

Outside AMERICA people don't see children as sexual objects that need to have their bodies censored in every publication.

Anonymous R just kept on posting this 7.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,694

@previous

This one is from cartoon network in Brazil!
This is the animated version of a comic that I used to read as a child.

Anonymous R just kept on posting this 7.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,695

@1,693

Pyrénée is a 1998 french feral child graphic novel (bande dessinée) by Regis Loisel and Philippe Sternis, about a girl who is brought up in the mountains of the French Pyrenees by a bear.

Pyrénée is available in French as Pyrénée, in German as Pyrenea and in Dutch as Pyrenee. It has not been translated into English, though whether this has anything to do with the central character's nudity is uncertain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyr%C3%A9n%C3%A9e

Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,696

@1,689

Violine

@1,690

Little Audrey

@1,691

The Enchanted Square

@1,692

The Magic Flower (USSR)

@1,693

Violine

@1,694

Monica's gang

(any chance you're a regular at Shoujo Imageboard?)

(Edited 55 seconds later.)

Anonymous I replied with this 7.5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,700

@1,695

The thing is Americans are not the only ones. Please stop uploading this. OT maybe taken down again because of it.

Anonymous S replied with this 7.5 years ago, 49 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,707

@previous

Why was OT taken down the last time? Seriously, it couldn't have been over this kind of stuff, dude. These are children's comics and cartoons, not ero-game CGs.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,709

@previous
It is due to byethost's bot found the word "SEA PEA" in the FAQ where it stated "SEA PEA is not allowed". It had nothing to do with the pics hosted here.

(Edited 36 minutes later by a moderator.)

Anonymous J replied with this 7.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,710

@1,707

The bot detected the words "SEA PEA" and "SEA PEA" within the rules, stating that it should not be posted.

The faulty host used a bit to detect the words. It automatically suspended it.

(Edited 31 minutes later by a moderator.)

grey joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 39 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,716

@Anon's T and J

SORRYSORRYSORRYSORRY!! But I had to edit your posts so they did not actually say those two words. If byethost's bots we're to crawl us at any point after you guys wrote those posts they would have seen those two words and had us suspended for the last time, even if its you guys who write it and not me it still counts! I'm really sorry and I really hate doing this but I had no choice. My backs against the wall on this one. I hope you guys can understand. TT.TT

Anonymous T replied with this 7.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,718

@previous

LOL On here, sorrie I forgot the stupid bot still lurking around hunting for "the word". And SEA PEA is a nice substitute :3

Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,719

@1,716

Use wordfilters! Sometimes they are fun!

grey replied with this 7.5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,720

@previous

I caaaaant. If I add those two words to the word filter then that means the words are in the code, the bot crawls the sauce code too. We would still be blow off the intertubes faster than you can say "SEA PEA SAILORS! AHOY!

Anonymous T replied with this 7.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,721

@previous

Can the code split the word checking into several cases like
if (word = "Ch!"+"ld"+" "+"p0"+"rnog"+"r@phy")

ah crap, forget it, too much trouble.
:/

grey replied with this 7.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,722

@previous

No, it can't. Believe me I've tried. Once we're on our new host all will be better.

Anonymous T replied with this 7.5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,723

@previous

Remember to send byethost a FUCK YOUR STUPID SEA PEA POLICY feedback afterwards.

Anonymous J replied with this 7.5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,731

@1,716

Sorry, it is my fault that I did not realize we still had that problem, officer.

Why not wordfilter those two words to prevent such a problem from taking place again?

Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 7.5 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,737

@previous

nigga, read
@1,720

(Edited 19 seconds later.)

grey replied with this 7.5 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,752

@previous

I already said. ;_;

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.5 years ago, 12 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[Top] #1,804

@1,667

Why would he watch hundreds of episodes for a few seconds of panty shots when hardcore loli hentai is abundant in Japan? The ones watching these shows are kids and the characters behave like that because real children behave like that!

Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 6.3 years ago, 1.2 year later, 1.2 year after the original post[Top] #10,399

Well, relevent, it came into effect just over a week ago, lol.

  !Tkun4nmzJI joined in and replied with this 6.3 years ago, 17 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post[Top] #10,407

@previous
Sauce?

So is Evangelion illegal now?
http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/04/27/tokyo-loli-ban-will-include-evangelion/

  !Tkun4nmzJI double-posted this 6.3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1.2 year after the original post[Top] #10,408

@previous
Oh I found it!
> The actual scope of the law excludes novels (otherwise Ishihara would be in the unique position of banning his own novels, which feature lurid tales of underage rape) and photographic material.

Wut? Ban 2D but allow photos? This guy just want real CP!!!

> The letter of the law also suggests events such as Comiket are now technically illegal, and if permitted are only allowed to continue on government sufferance

  !Tkun4nmzJI triple-posted this 6.3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1.2 year after the original post[Top] #10,409

@previous
Wait a moment!

*Check pixiv*
.
.
.
nothing changed there! Seems like this will be affecting just non-adult anime/manga...

Enjoy your "4kids" censoring direct from Japan!

Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 6.3 years ago, 19 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post[Top] #10,415

@previous
> implying loli ban = 4kids level of censorship
mad pedo lol

  !Tkun4nmzJI replied with this 6.3 years ago, 2 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post[Top] #10,416

@previous
Read it! It is not loli only mister troll!
> The law itself specifically targets (2D) content which “improperly glorifies or promotes illegal sexual activity,” a notably broad definition which Tokyo, for the time being at least, has clarified as specifically targeting “works depicting women enjoying being raped or incest as being fun.” It is widely expected that underage sexual activity (i.e. anything involving schoolgirls) is intended to be part of the ban in due course.

Also the guy who made the law excluded his own works.
> The actual scope of the law excludes novels (otherwise Ishihara would be in the unique position of banning his own novels, which feature lurid tales of underage rape) and photographic material. Although drafted with manga foremost in mind, it is also intended to cover anime and, in principle at least, also supplants Japan’s game censorship regime.

Note that he didn't ban photographic matterial. So he plans to cut the 2D industry so junior idols can thrive!

http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2011/07/01/tokyo-manga-ban-now-in-effect/

(Edited 4 minutes later.)

  !Tkun4nmzJI double-posted this 6.3 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1.2 year after the original post[Top] #10,417

@previous
Thinking about this I wonder if guro, vore and other weird fetish are classified as illegal sexual activities too... guro often involves torture and murder but they aren't technically a sexual activity but as a fetish it might be... And Alucard seems pretty found of guro...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSUbgyGc9qA

So, tentacle rape isn't really illegal right? It isn't even real sex, just a monster laying eggs XD

grey !C.MxxuCiTo replied with this 6.3 years ago, 1 day later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,424

http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/11/21/tokyo-loli-ban-now-total-hentai-ban/
I'd really like know what an average Japanese thinks of this. They only person who seems to want this is Ishihara himself. Why does just one person hold so much power? At least here the people get to vote on laws that happen on town level.

  !Tkun4nmzJI replied with this 6.3 years ago, 3 hours later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,428

I'm starting to think that at first this will block some publications on Tokyo but latter it will end like the genital censoring... pointless

Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 6.3 years ago, 9 hours later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,430

@previous
I hope so, I don't want my loli to be illegal... mind, maybe it'll just prompt them to make less sexual scenes, which I'm okay with. Don't like the pr0n, I just like the loli.

  !Tkun4nmzJI replied with this 6.3 years ago, 4 hours later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,431

@previous
I don't care about fanservice in non-adult manga but I don't want censoring. If they think this or that manga is too explicit just raise it for +18 and not make it illegal. If I wanted to see a Disney movie I would watch a Disney movie!

Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 6.3 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,432

@previous
That's actually what's been done, dude. It can still be sold, but only to 18+ individuals, and only in porn stores and stuff.

  !Tkun4nmzJI replied with this 6.3 years ago, 8 hours later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,440

@previous
Acording to the article they aren't being moved to 18+ only, they aren't being published at all...

Konata5 joined in and replied with this 6.3 years ago, 4 weeks later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,638

Super anime fan Konata5 supports your desires but forums like these dont do stuff if petitions dont work than use money or riot :) i am like L alias names are what i go by i hate censorship of what is natural if their is wind let a skirt fly if they are in the air or falling let a dress or skirt move this world is full of wimps just because you see panties will not make you a sex offender heck my friend uses it so he does not become one for those who dont get what i say oh well :)

grey !C.MxxuCiTo replied with this 6.3 years ago, 12 hours later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,646

@previous
I support this sentiment. And I very rarely use my real name on the Internet for anything. And I never have any connections between my real name and my aliases.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

. !NzLASIJfYM joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 1 day later, 1.3 year after the original post[Top] #10,658

@10,638
why am I suspicious of someone who agrees with me?

FoplelorI joined in and replied with this 6.2 years ago, 2 days later, 1.4 year after the original post[Top] #10,687

What's up guys, I'm new

<a href=http://health5news.com/?p=2182>Abs Assassin Workout</a>
(lolb&)

(Edited 5 hours later by a moderator.)

baniblinguize joined in and replied with this 5.7 years ago, 6 months later, 1.9 year after the original post[Top] #12,148

This IP address (no valid host name) is associated with 95 IDs and has been used to post 0 existing topics and 1 existing reply.
(Fuck you.)

(Edited 14 hours later by a moderator.)

Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 5.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 1.9 year after the original post[Top] #12,149

Are the bots always this active, or are the mods just getting sick of it?

. !NzLASIJfYM replied with this 5.7 years ago, 10 hours later, 1.9 year after the original post[Top] #12,151

@previous
They come around every month or so, but there's been a notable increase in the "intelligence" of the posts, in that they actually seem to be posting in somewhat coherent English, instead of smashing a russian keyboard and inserting urls occasionally.

Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 5.4 years ago, 3 months later, 2.2 years after the original post[Top] #12,546

> almost get hopes up that someone is actually trying to revive a thread
> otakutalk.org
oh yeah....

. !NzLASIJfYM replied with this 5.4 years ago, 2 days later, 2.2 years after the original post[Top] #12,557

@previous
:<

  !Tkun4nmzJI replied with this 5.4 years ago, 4 hours later, 2.2 years after the original post[Top] #12,558

There were that thing where the Swedish Supreme Court decided that drawings are not real people.
:
:3
Powered by TinyBBS open source (mit) software. Keep this project alive by donating. This page took 0.01592 seconds to be generated.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. The images and comments are the responsibility of the posters.


- OtakuTalk Mobile Imageboard + Overtalk Navigator -