OtakuTalk

Affiliates: Tablecats Lounge! Tinychan! /prog/ Ylilauta! Vectors! Your link here!

Boards: /d/

Topic: RE: OtakuTalk article.


Anonymous A started this discussion 7.8 years ago #214

Hi dudes, Lolicon Guy' here again. I've just started up a small 'attack' wiki (kind of like '''ED'''), and I'm planning to include a section on '''ATBBS boards'''. Would anyone here be interested in writing an article about 'OtakuTalk? It should include both facts and humor, such as a brief history of the site and summaries of any 'drama' that's taken place over the past year or so.

If any of you are interested in writing the article (or have ideas how it could be written), you could post a couple of drafts in this thread and use the best elements from each. That way, you get to decide what goes into the article yourselves.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 52 minutes later[Top] #2,292

Can we have the sites' URL?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[Top] #2,298

lols @the shitty copy of ED
---- @TGComix making a rage wiki after TC assraped him
---- @TGCOMIX

could you come back to TC? the DM drama has gotten stale.

(Edited 22 seconds later.)

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[Top] #2,304

> Lolicon Guy here again

When were you here in the first place?

Also yeah I could write it. What should it include, and why is it called "attack"

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[Top] #2,313

URL?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[Top] #2,315

@2,304

> When were you here in the first place?

Posted this:
http://otakutalk.org/topic/181
and contributed to these:
http://otakutalk.org/topic/70
http://otakutalk.org/topic/86
http://otakutalk.org/topic/180

> Also yeah I could write it. What should it include?

It should include both facts and humor, such as a brief history of the site and summaries of any 'drama' that's taken place over the past year or so.

> why is it called "attack"

It's an attack site: the articles are all vulgar, insulting and inflammatory. It's intended to make people angry and cause butthurt - sort of like E.D.

(Edited 29 seconds later.)

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 33 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[Top] #2,317

Can we have a link?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 9 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[Top] #2,334

I really would like to (not to sound too much like kimmo here but) 'spread the word' of OtakuTalk because this is really a awesome place but at the same time you say its a satire site like ED, correct? Not being judgmental here wouldn't that be a bad thing for us? A public article making fun of us? Or would it have to be funny?


Also what everybody else is saying: LINK.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[Top] #2,373

Dicks everywhere

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[Top] #2,377

booooring. On your front page: fagfagfagfagfaggotfagfag. Is that all you can say?

Anonymous H replied with this 7.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[Top] #2,380

@previous

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[Top] #2,382

@2,334

> Not being judgmental here wouldn't that be a bad thing for us? A public article making fun of us? Or would it have to be funny?

I'm a big fan of OtakuTalk; that's why I'm asking you'' guys to write the article. Yes, you ''should try to make as funny as possible, and you shouldn't take yourselves too seriously, but the article doesn't need to be entirely negative. For example, you could explain why OT is obviously superior to every other ATBBS, but make the comparison so over-the-top ridiculous that anyyone who reads it knows you're kidding around.

RE: Links:

The wiki's just getting started and I've been having some technical difficulties. I'd rather not post links until the problems have been resolved and there are enough articles to make the site worth visiting.

Anonymous D replied with this 7.8 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[Top] #2,396

@previous

> >Not being judgmental here wouldn't that be a bad thing for us? A public article making fun of us? Or would it have to be funny?
>
> I'm a big fan of OtakuTalk; that's why I'm asking you'' guys to write the article. Yes, you ''should try to make as funny as possible, and you shouldn't take yourselves too seriously, but the article doesn't need to be entirely negative. For example, you could explain why OT is obviously superior to every other ATBBS, but make the comparison so over-the-top ridiculous that anyyone who reads it knows you're kidding around.
>
> RE: Links:
>
> The wiki's just getting started and I've been having some technical difficulties. I'd rather not post links until the problems have been resolved and there are enough articles to make the site worth visiting.

Okay. I'll write this. Gimmmie a day or so and I'll post it.

Anonymous D double-posted this 7.8 years ago, 13 hours later, 1 day after the original post[Top] #2,434

@previous

ok. maybe two days. I'm fucking overworked.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 7.8 years ago, 19 hours later, 2 days after the original post[Top] #2,478

Give a link. nobody can find the derping site.

Anonymous D replied with this 7.8 years ago, 49 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[Top] #2,479

@previous

> Give a link. nobody can find the derping site.

> derping

oh LOL. Thanks Anon. New swear obtained.

Anonymous D double-posted this 7.7 years ago, 4 days later, 6 days after the original post[Top] #2,843

OtakuTalk is another one of the ATBBS based chans made during the explosion of ATBBS boards made to troll Kimmo-chan, but is one of the few that is not dead.
At first it was made just for a guy called grey to fiddle around with and learn how the software works. (hence the current domain of the site) A couple of his friends made a post or two but never came back. Then Jan and hobs added it to their overtalk sites and people started coming in. Unfortunately grey is an idiot and chose byethost as his host. The probelm with that is that byethost itself is idiotic. Otakutalk have been taken down 3 so far. The first time was probably the the most retarded. One day byethost decided to send out bots to crawl all their sites for the phrase "child porn", or any variation of it. One might ask, "why would this get OT taken down? Its not a p3d0phil3 clubhouse like Analtalk!" And your right, its not. In fact, in the rules of the site, grey says, "No child porn." but this is inherently WHY OT was taking down. The fucktarded bot read the words "child porn" in the sentence "No child porn." and shut down the grey's account with them. After much arguing with byethost, OT was back up...for all of 3 hours before it was taken down for no reason at all. When contacted about this they respond only with "Reactivated for the last time" and put it back up. The 3rd time was when the DNS crashed for around half a hour. No one knows why.
OtakuTalk is currently (Mar/22/2010) in the process of moving to a new host, and with newer ATBBS software that has more features such as tripcodes.

OtakuTalk is as the name would suggest, like what 4chan was back in its glory days, all about Anime, manga, technology and gadgets.(minus the /b/) The community is made up of otaku, geeks, nerds, programmers, and japanophiles of all kinds and they are a generally a kind, fun, non-hostile, and constructive bunch. Topics range from the most obscure anime to threads about programming to discussion about Japanese culture.

Anonymous G replied with this 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 days after the original post[Top] #2,850

@previous

> OtakuTalk is another one of the ATBBS based chans made during the explosion of ATBBS boards made to troll Kimmo-chan, but is one of the few that is not dead.
> At first it was made just for a guy called grey to fiddle around with and learn how the software works. (hence the current domain of the site) A couple of his friends made a post or two but never came back. Then Jan and hobs added it to their overtalk sites and people started coming in. Unfortunately grey is an idiot and chose byethost as his host. The probelm with that is that byethost itself is idiotic. Otakutalk have been taken down 3 so far. The first time was probably the the most retarded. One day byethost decided to send out bots to crawl all their sites for the phrase "child porn", or any variation of it. One might ask, "why would this get OT taken down? Its not a p3d0phil3 clubhouse like Analtalk!" And your right, its not. In fact, in the rules of the site, grey says, "No child porn." but this is inherently WHY OT was taking down. The fucktarded bot read the words "child porn" in the sentence "No child porn." and shut down the grey's account with them. After much arguing with byethost, OT was back up...for all of 3 hours before it was taken down for no reason at all. When contacted about this they respond only with "Reactivated for the last time" and put it back up. The 3rd time was when the DNS crashed for around half a hour. No one knows why.
> OtakuTalk is currently (Mar/22/2010) in the process of moving to a new host, and with newer ATBBS software that has more features such as tripcodes.
>
> OtakuTalk is as the name would suggest, like what 4chan was back in its glory days, all about Anime, manga, technology and gadgets.(minus the /b/) The community is made up of otaku, geeks, nerds, programmers, and japanophiles of all kinds and they are a generally a kind, fun, non-hostile, and constructive bunch. Topics range from the most obscure anime to threads about programming to discussion about Japanese culture.

lol'd

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.7 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,867

@2,843

Thanks very much for writing that. New page added to Hateline with a few changes; article may be read here:

http://sites.google.com/site/dlwysf/otakutalk

We now have one article worth reading.

grey joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,869

@previous

THAT. Was funny as hell. It actually looks pretty good. Good jorb OP.

YOU CHANGED ANALTALK TO TINYCHAN OH LAWL.

(Edited 51 seconds later by a moderator.)

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,889

@2,867
Please make a note under reasons to visit that the are no Furrry =^_^= threads filled with crimes against nature.

(Edited 26 seconds later.)

Anonymous G replied with this 7.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,907

> In addition to the usual basement-dwelling filth, OT is frequented by a number of TC mods and namefags; Krodan, Nega and On are all known to "moonlight" the board on >occasion - mainly to escape Tinychan's never-ending shitfuckery.

Ahahahaha!
I like it. Just don't make 'the most obscure anime' redirect to SEAAA!! PEAAA!!. Even if its for a joke, it contradicts of other jokes in the article.

Anonymous M replied with this 7.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,924

@previous
shit nobody cares about would be more appropriate there

grey replied with this 7.7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,927

@previous

lol, yes.

Anonymous M replied with this 7.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,929

@previous
so, were you going to use that update I sent?

grey replied with this 7.7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,932

@previous

The CSS yeah. But Idk about the new topic.PHP. It probably wont work with the new software. I was going to ask HostGuy about it.

(Edited 55 seconds later by a moderator.)

Anonymous M replied with this 7.7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,933

@previous
what new software? The css won't do any good if you don't have the updated topics.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.7 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,951

@2,867

Glad you enjoyed it so much, but all praise should be directed to Anonymous D for actually writing the article. Fantastic job dude, thanks very much for that.

BTW, Grey: can you remember the exact date OT went online? I'd like to add that to the article as well.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous E replied with this 7.7 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,955

@2,907

Tee-hee. ;D
iLoL'd

Needs moar OC in the other articles though. :p

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,959

@previous

What does "OC" mean?

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,960

@previous

Have you never been on a *chan before? It means Original Content.

grey replied with this 7.7 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #2,985

@2,951

In the dashboard:
> Went live on 2010-03-17, 2 months ago.

It was a couple weeks before that. I had to screw around with the database and unix timestamp so its of by about two weeks. Those two weeks were are blur of medication and sql crashes.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.7 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,013

@2,955
> Needs moar OC in the other articles though. :p

Well, you're perfectly welcome to write an article if you want. I'd welcome any new content, especially blatant attack articles on TC namefags or anyone else you don't like.

Anonymous D replied with this 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,016

@previous

moot. Nao.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.7 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,040

@previous

Good idea. Anyone want to do a page on Moot? I'd also welcome attack articles on Jan Martin, Nickalollyoff and GaryOak7. The more obscene, the better.

Anonymous D replied with this 7.7 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,058

@previous

What about you? Its your wiki.

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 7.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,071

@3,040

> Nickalollyoff

who?

grey replied with this 7.7 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,097

> Despite its low traffic and a discernable lack of drama, OT is far superior to confirmed pedo-hives such as Anustawk or Tinyshit.

Doohohohohhoh ;3

Anonymous J replied with this 7.7 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,102

@3,071

Nickalollyoff: batshit crazy TC moderator; ionizes people for no reason whatsoever, has his head so far up Jan's ass that they could star in The Human Centipede 2.

(Garyoak7 would be the third segment)

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Anonymous D replied with this 7.7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,104

@previous

We need photos of these guys. I'm sure they've all camwhored at some point.

Anonymous M replied with this 7.7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,107

@previous
http://www.tinychan.org/img/
have fun searching for gary's cock.

Anonymous D replied with this 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,108

@previous

OH GOD A IMAGE ARCHIVE
DONT DO THIS TO ME I WILL GET LOST IN THERE AND NEVER COME OUT

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,120

@3,058

Except for the OtakuTalk page, I've written every article on the site (some of them were originally posted at ED, but they were all my own work, so I just ported them over to Hateline). I'm working on the wiki everyday, but I'd like to get some more contributors so there'll be a variety of writing styles and viewpoints.

If anyone wants to write a bio on Jan, Moot, Gary or anyone else you don't like, just post it to this thread. All submissions will be appreciated, no matter how long or short.

Anonymous D replied with this 7.7 years ago, 15 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,151

@previous

Hm. Idk enough about Jan to write about him. Same with Gary. but moot...I know waaaay to much about him. an article on him written by me would be pages long and just turn into a hate rant. I dont wanna write that much.

Anonymous P replied with this 7.7 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,157

@3,120

> Except for the OtakuTalk page, I've written every article on the site (some of them were originally posted at ED, but they were all my own work, so I just ported them over to Hateline).

Ya, but don't you think they need a bit of... adaption? :-j

Anonymous M replied with this 7.7 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,164

@previous
sup nega

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,167

@3,157

> Ya, but don't you think they need a bit of... adaption? :-j

What do you suggest?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 7.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,168

@3,151

> an article on Moot written by me would be pages long and just turn into a hate rant.

Hate rants are exactly what we want at Hateline.

(Edited 58 seconds later.)

Anonymous D replied with this 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[Top] #3,173

@previous

I knoow but it would just TAKE SOOO FUCKING LONG TO WRITE. i fuckin hate typeing
:
:3
Powered by TinyBBS open source (mit) software. Keep this project alive by donating. This page took 0.00976 seconds to be generated.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. The images and comments are the responsibility of the posters.


- OtakuTalk Mobile Imageboard + Overtalk Navigator -